Board.KolibriOS.org

I do not want the code I have written after the midterm to be used in the CPUID application. This means all the listed things I have posted earlier.

mat1854 wrote:I do not want the code I have written after the midterm to be used in the CPUID application. This means all the listed things I have posted earlier.

I'm sorry to hear that.
You do realize this way you'll be violating the terms you agreed with while entering the program, and what consequences this could have?

Do we need to rewrite everything after mid term then?
I don't think violating any licenses (no matter how informal) should be practiced...

mat1854 wrote:I do not want the code I have written after the midterm to be used in the CPUID application. This means all the listed things I have posted earlier.

Could you clarify what you mean?
Are you saying this because you feel the quality of code does not match your expectations of yourself?
OR
Do you mean we should not use it because you (being the author) do not want it to be used in CPUID?

https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/terms/student Your lose any rights on this code

mat1854
Not mentioning the rules, you have received pass on midterm evaluation by me in advance, while Wildwest was not completely agree, but on final evaluation he was confident. Summary result is about 50%, so half money is sort of fare.

Wildwest asked me to write the code after the actual deadline because Pathoswithin asked him about something. So many problems with his mentorship. But if we can not change my fail status now, all I want to make clear is I DO NOT GIVE PERMISSION TO USE THE CODE I HAVE WRITTEN AFTER THE MIDTERM.

If we can still change the status ,I can give explanation.

Thanks.

Wildwest, I wouldn't expect anything more from you. Asked me until the very end to fix things, and post the versions, and at the end surprises me with a fail. You are not a good fit for a mentor.

No problems with mentorship, this student just don't want to work from the start and don't show any results for successful finish of project.

BTW, mat1854 banned for 1) personal insults during GSOC and after it, 2) constant lying, 3) this demarche.

Тема сообщения: Re: bug fix
От: mat1854
Отправлено: Ср авг 24, 2016 11:09 pm
Получатель: Wildwest

Ok I will put the version in forum. but the thing is last time when I did the SVN commit, that version was working fine when I compiled, but Pathoswithin had to change paths for the SVN commit.

So now if I keep the paths the way Pathoswithin changed to, it don't compile. But I will submit the compiled version in forum.

Also, for the last question, I didn't mean anything specific to you. I had bad experience in the beginning when I started looking at open source organizations and that's just my thought that may help the program. Otherwise, there were so many other questions specifically about mentor, where I have always said that you were very helpful and the discussion we had helped me in solving whatever problem was in hand. and whatever things are left, I don't blame you for that.

I had a great experience with GSoC and KolibriOS and that's what I have said. Please don't take anything personal because that thing doesn't concern KolibriOS at all.

The link to IBM site here viewtopic.php?f=42&t=594&start=135#p65711 shows that this student don't understand anything in CPUID instruction at the midterm. And it was one of the reasons why I asked others mentors to think on failing her at midterm.

Wildwest
Have you informed mat1854, that if she will not speed up her progress she is going to fail?
And to be sure, that we also have no problems with moderatorship, can you post an examples of lying and personal insults during GSOC?

Pathoswithin, first of all, I want to see how you apologise for your behavior.

Well, seems like we do have problems with moderatorship, and maybe with mentorship (not sure). Anyway, straight to business.

mat1854
Even if Wildwest never told you, that you are going to fail, you should have known, that to pass final evaluation, you must do all the things from the time-line of the final PDF proposal, that you have submitted in the beginning, or at least more than 75% of them. Since you have received pass on midterm evaluation in advance (and you should realize that), Wildwest could have asked you to do up to 50% of work, even if he was intend to fail you.

About your request. The rules of GSoC says clearly:
6. Students.
6.6. Responsibilities.
a) Each accepted Student will perform all necessary additional steps required for the Student to participate in the Program, including:
iv) publishing his or her Project code in a publicly accessible location and under an Open Source Initiative approved license of the Organization’s choice.

The code, that once have been published by the owner under an Open Source license (at least GPL), can not be forbidden to be used by anyone and anywhere, except the restrictions of the license. Moreover, you have failed to do the proper code submission, cause Google requires to submit the difference between the initial and resulting code, not just the sources. You should have opened your repo by committing the initial sources, and then your changes. So now, it's even hard to say, which code is yours.

Bug report:
Program crashes, KolibriOS img rev6558