Leency wrote:
1. Разделить форум на равнозначные сегменты: английский и русский.
The choice is between
* Having separate English and Russian forums: people asking same questions in different languages, reporting and discussing same issues twice, and
* Closing English forum: having a mess of English and Russian comments in one forum.
My opinion is that the bigger evil is the former one.
inb4: close Spanish forum
Leency wrote:
2. Обновить форум
I have no idea how to do it.
Same for moving to the new server, what XVilka has been asking for for many months.
If there are any instructions, I can invest my time.
Leency wrote:
3. Обновить сайт
Same as above.
Leency wrote:
4.
* Social platforms are important, for the fresh blood in particular. Thank you for your VK activity.
* I see no problem to discuss offtopic topics in offtopic forum. Just like we do now and like it is on
the fasm board.
Leency wrote:
5. При принятии решений должен быть бОльший вес голоса у людей, вносящих реальный вклад в развитие проекта.
Decision is always made by the programmer.
Technical decisions are made after technical discussion, if required, not after pools.
Pools are informative, not normative.
E.g. nobody (and no pool) can force you to change C-- to C, not me, not CleverMouse, not even Allah!
Leency wrote:
куда двигаться
Finish What Ya Started (c)
Гордон Фримен wrote:
Да, тут не мешало бы сделать чат, но насколько он будет эффективен?
We already have a
chat.
Гордон Фримен wrote:
Знаете, какое есть предложение?
Создать на Гугл диске документ Word, раздать всем ссылку на редактирование его и устроить текстовую/голосовую по дискорду или другому приложению дискуссию с добавлениями в текстовый документ пунктов, которые были одобрены.
What happens then?
Boppan wrote:
What about executable and DLL formats?
Here's two separated universes: Universe of COFF and Serge's universe of PE. It looks a little comfusing.
There is a
PE patch by CleverMouse with a list of things to do.
Boppan wrote:
Here's coders with huge need to write something valuable, but they need adequate roadmap.
Read the board, there are many ideas to implement, e.g.
this one. Or
this.
rgimad wrote:
Boppan, согласен. Задачи по ядру должны быть выявлены, сформулированы, всеобще одобрены и записаны в одном месте. Оттуда по пунктам брать, выполнять и вычеркивать.
Read old board threads, there are many ideas discussed there: with technical info, often with patches or useful links/keywords.